Difference between revisions of "Lynching in America and Marion"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Background and Rationale=== | ===Background and Rationale=== | ||
| − | Marion was like most parts of the country in the 1920's, it was industrially prosperous, it had a growing population, and there was tremendous racial tension. This racial conflict resulted in Marion's most infamous event on August 7, 1930. Citizens of Marion and of its surrounding towns organized the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith. This was the last lynching that occurred north of the Mason Dixon Line. Marion's local Newspaper, ''The Daily Leader'' (later known as ''The Marion Daily Chronicle'') from the 1890's until the 1920's, contained daily reports of lynchings nationwide, both in the North and the South. In fact, some of the more blatantly racist articles were published in Indiana, like that of Evansville, IN in 1891. In this particular article an African American male was accused of assault and lynched. The article is entitled, "Deserved His Fate". A large majority of these newpaper articles, that are found between mundane ads for cigars and wallpaper, are very similar in nature. The story is the same: an African American man is accused of sexual assualt or of a stray shooting and is condemned and prosecuted by the vigilante white community. In fact, "the main reasons for the lynching of Afro-Americans were murder and rape or attempted rape" (Patterson). The innumerable claims of sexual assualt on white, usually very young, females were a common theme in these articles. They were intended to provoke not only a feeling of pity, but action. In the cases of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith, they were accused of both the shooting and murder of a white man, Claude Deeter, and the rape of a young white woman, Mary Ball. These claims of black on white violence set the stage for the | + | Marion was like most parts of the country in the 1920's, it was industrially prosperous, it had a growing population, and there was tremendous racial tension. This racial conflict resulted in Marion's most infamous event on August 7, 1930. Citizens of Marion and of its surrounding towns organized the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith. This was the last lynching that occurred north of the Mason Dixon Line. Marion's local Newspaper, ''The Daily Leader'' (later known as ''The Marion Daily Chronicle'') from the 1890's until the 1920's, contained daily reports of lynchings nationwide, both in the North and the South. In fact, some of the more blatantly racist articles were published in Indiana, like that of Evansville, IN in 1891. In this particular article an African American male was accused of assault and lynched. The article is entitled, "Deserved His Fate". A large majority of these newpaper articles, that are found between mundane ads for cigars and wallpaper, are very similar in nature. The story is the same: an African American man is accused of sexual assualt or of a stray shooting and is condemned and prosecuted by the vigilante white community. In fact, "the main reasons for the lynching of Afro-Americans were murder and rape or attempted rape" (Patterson). The innumerable claims of sexual assualt on white, usually very young, females were a common theme in these articles. They were intended to provoke not only a feeling of pity, but action. In the cases of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith, they were accused of both the shooting and murder of a white man, Claude Deeter, and the rape of a young white woman, Mary Ball. These claims of black on white violence set the stage for the lynchings that were similar to those of other, national lynchings. |
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | The justification for the lynching of Smith and Shipp was the murder of a white man and the rape of a white woman, these would be legitimate claims if a court had actually found the men guilty. Most national justifications for lynching African Americans come from charges of sexual assault and shooting. These claims insinuate that the citizens' actions were a crime of passion and not premeditated. Their actions were the result of long-standing ideals about sexuality. This cause stemmed from the white male supremacist ideal of segregating white | + | The justification for the lynching of Smith and Shipp was the murder of a white man and the rape of a white woman, these would be legitimate claims if a court had actually found the men guilty. Most national justifications for lynching African Americans come from charges of sexual assault and shooting. These claims insinuate that the citizens' actions were a crime of passion and not premeditated. Their actions were the result of long-standing ideals about sexuality. This cause stemmed from the white male supremacist ideal of segregating white women and black men. Historian Forrest Wood articulately suggested that white males still possess the fear of sexually suppressed white women expressing their sexuality fully, |
<blockquote>"For generations, southern white men had successfully dehumanized their women in order to perpetuate their own privileged position and rationalize their own sexual accesses. If white women took it upon themselves to express their sexuality fully, the presence of high-powered animalistic Negroes would allow them to destroy completely the socio-sexual culture that had evolved over the decades. The Civil War abolished slavery, it did not abolish the southern way of life."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"For generations, southern white men had successfully dehumanized their women in order to perpetuate their own privileged position and rationalize their own sexual accesses. If white women took it upon themselves to express their sexuality fully, the presence of high-powered animalistic Negroes would allow them to destroy completely the socio-sexual culture that had evolved over the decades. The Civil War abolished slavery, it did not abolish the southern way of life."</blockquote> | ||
After the end of the Civil War, Euro-American men could no longer control Afro-American men. In order to retain their socio-sexual culture, Euro-American men responded to the emancipation of slaves through racial violence and lynching. "So ingrained and completely institutionalized was the culture of honor and violence in the Old South that it persists right down to the present"(Patterson). | After the end of the Civil War, Euro-American men could no longer control Afro-American men. In order to retain their socio-sexual culture, Euro-American men responded to the emancipation of slaves through racial violence and lynching. "So ingrained and completely institutionalized was the culture of honor and violence in the Old South that it persists right down to the present"(Patterson). | ||
===Influences and Similarities=== | ===Influences and Similarities=== | ||
| − | I believe that lynchings both nationwide and in Marion followed a similar pattern. This pattern was a result of both human sacrificial nature and outside influences such as the ''Marion Daily Chronicle''. This particular process usually consists of an African American man who is charged for either assault or rape, which results in his imprisonment. Members of the community then band together or riot and often obtain their victim from the local jail by force. There are few cases that occurred in the late 1800's until the 1920's in which law enforcement disallowed rioters to enter the jail. Unfortunately, these cases | + | I believe that lynchings both nationwide and in Marion followed a similar pattern. This pattern was a result of both human sacrificial nature and outside influences such as the ''Marion Daily Chronicle''. This particular process usually consists of an African American man who is charged for either assault or rape, which results in his imprisonment. Members of the community then band together or riot and often obtain their victim from the local jail by force. There are few cases that occurred in the late 1800's until the 1920's in which law enforcement disallowed rioters to enter the jail. Unfortunately, these cases account for about half of overall lynchings (NAACP). Most often, rioters were able to enter and attack the accused man. The accused were then dragged to a tree or light post that was usually in front of a public building or street and hung. This script is a common theme throughout sources about lynchings from the 1890's until 1930. |
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | James Cameron, who survived the lynching and was also accused of the crime, claimed to have heard the voice of God who said, "Take this boy back. He had nothing to do with this," Cameron claimed to have "heard this voice, but no one else did. Nevertheless, the crowd grew quiet and they released me." There are other eyewitness accounts of a hushed silence that occurred while Cameron stood beneath the corpses of his two friends with a noose around his neck. This hushed silence was due to the natural human response to a sacrifice. | + | James Cameron, who survived the lynching and was also accused of the crime, claimed to have heard the voice of God who said, "Take this boy back. He had nothing to do with this," Cameron claimed to have "heard this voice, but no one else did. Nevertheless, the crowd grew quiet and they released me." There are other eyewitness accounts of a hushed silence that occurred while Cameron stood beneath the corpses of his two friends with a noose around his neck. This hushed silence was due to the natural human response to a sacrifice. Patterson eloquently calls this an "awed hush, in the face and smell of death." He also claims that "an essential part of the sacrificial rite is that some profound change occurs in the sacrificed object, and there is awe in actually witnessing the transition from a state of life to a state of death." There are many documented instances of lynchings that afterwards, resulted in a sudden silence from its witnesses. |
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 2 June 2011
Contents
Introduction
The Marion lynchings emulated the nationwide ritualistic practice which occurred due to social and racial issues. The rationale for both national lynchings and Marion’s lynchings were similar in nature and based off of male white supremacist beliefs. The people of Marion were well-informed of the lynching process due to the influence of their local newspaper. Their actions were also influenced by a deeply-ingrained human sacrificial nature.
Background and Rationale
Marion was like most parts of the country in the 1920's, it was industrially prosperous, it had a growing population, and there was tremendous racial tension. This racial conflict resulted in Marion's most infamous event on August 7, 1930. Citizens of Marion and of its surrounding towns organized the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith. This was the last lynching that occurred north of the Mason Dixon Line. Marion's local Newspaper, The Daily Leader (later known as The Marion Daily Chronicle) from the 1890's until the 1920's, contained daily reports of lynchings nationwide, both in the North and the South. In fact, some of the more blatantly racist articles were published in Indiana, like that of Evansville, IN in 1891. In this particular article an African American male was accused of assault and lynched. The article is entitled, "Deserved His Fate". A large majority of these newpaper articles, that are found between mundane ads for cigars and wallpaper, are very similar in nature. The story is the same: an African American man is accused of sexual assualt or of a stray shooting and is condemned and prosecuted by the vigilante white community. In fact, "the main reasons for the lynching of Afro-Americans were murder and rape or attempted rape" (Patterson). The innumerable claims of sexual assualt on white, usually very young, females were a common theme in these articles. They were intended to provoke not only a feeling of pity, but action. In the cases of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith, they were accused of both the shooting and murder of a white man, Claude Deeter, and the rape of a young white woman, Mary Ball. These claims of black on white violence set the stage for the lynchings that were similar to those of other, national lynchings.
The justification for the lynching of Smith and Shipp was the murder of a white man and the rape of a white woman, these would be legitimate claims if a court had actually found the men guilty. Most national justifications for lynching African Americans come from charges of sexual assault and shooting. These claims insinuate that the citizens' actions were a crime of passion and not premeditated. Their actions were the result of long-standing ideals about sexuality. This cause stemmed from the white male supremacist ideal of segregating white women and black men. Historian Forrest Wood articulately suggested that white males still possess the fear of sexually suppressed white women expressing their sexuality fully,
"For generations, southern white men had successfully dehumanized their women in order to perpetuate their own privileged position and rationalize their own sexual accesses. If white women took it upon themselves to express their sexuality fully, the presence of high-powered animalistic Negroes would allow them to destroy completely the socio-sexual culture that had evolved over the decades. The Civil War abolished slavery, it did not abolish the southern way of life."
After the end of the Civil War, Euro-American men could no longer control Afro-American men. In order to retain their socio-sexual culture, Euro-American men responded to the emancipation of slaves through racial violence and lynching. "So ingrained and completely institutionalized was the culture of honor and violence in the Old South that it persists right down to the present"(Patterson).
Influences and Similarities
I believe that lynchings both nationwide and in Marion followed a similar pattern. This pattern was a result of both human sacrificial nature and outside influences such as the Marion Daily Chronicle. This particular process usually consists of an African American man who is charged for either assault or rape, which results in his imprisonment. Members of the community then band together or riot and often obtain their victim from the local jail by force. There are few cases that occurred in the late 1800's until the 1920's in which law enforcement disallowed rioters to enter the jail. Unfortunately, these cases account for about half of overall lynchings (NAACP). Most often, rioters were able to enter and attack the accused man. The accused were then dragged to a tree or light post that was usually in front of a public building or street and hung. This script is a common theme throughout sources about lynchings from the 1890's until 1930.
The Marion lynching does follow this pattern. White community members were able to obtain Shipp, Smith, and Cameron from the Marion jail with little resistance from law enforcement. Marion's sheriff at the time of the lynching, Sheriff Campbell, was rumored to be a member of the Klu Klux Klan. Citizens knew that they could penetrate the jail with ease. The lynching of Shipp, Smith and the attempted lynching of Cameron occurred at a tree in front of the Grant County Courthouse, an open and public place. The Marion lynching has a startling resemblance to those found in The Marion Chronicle between 1890 until 1930.
Although it is almost certain that the citizens of Grant County who participated in the lynching were influenced by the daily articles on national lynchings, there is also a human sacrificial nature aspect involved. W. Fitzhugh Brundage claims that there are four main types of lynchers, the last being mass mobs numbering between fifty and several thousands, which had the full support of the community for their extralegal and illegal activities. He argues that the mass mob demonstrated the "highly ritualized choreography" of the chase, the careful selection of the sacrificial site, the sadistic torture (and often burning) of the victim, and the collection of mementos from the victim's body and the site of the sacrifice(Patterson). The crowd which Brundage described as customary for sacrificial lynchings was consistent with the Marion lynching. The crowd that had gathered in front of the Grant County courthouse was an estimated four thousand people. There were also rumors circulating of a supposed lynching that very day in both Marion and Fairmount, the home town of Claude Deeter(Madison). The mob that entered the Marion Jail "grabbed Shipp and began to club him as they dragged him outside." Even after Shipp had been lynched from the window bars on the east side of the jail, the mob continued to beat the dead body(Madison). Abe Smith also fell victim to the torture of the mob and was "clubbed and beaten". This torture was customary for human sacrifices. Many of the eyewitnesses took souvenirs. "Souvenir collectors cut pieces of clothing from the two bodies and bark from the lynching tree." The taking of relics from the dead victims is also characteristic of human sacrifices(Madison). According to Patterson, the most common way for consecrating a place for sacrifice was to build a fire. The fire is an important aspect in past sacrifices because it symbolized the deity(Patterson). The Marion lynching also contained the importance of the sacrificial conflagration. The mobbers attempted to "build a fire under the bodies, but it failed to burn them"(Madison).
James Cameron, who survived the lynching and was also accused of the crime, claimed to have heard the voice of God who said, "Take this boy back. He had nothing to do with this," Cameron claimed to have "heard this voice, but no one else did. Nevertheless, the crowd grew quiet and they released me." There are other eyewitness accounts of a hushed silence that occurred while Cameron stood beneath the corpses of his two friends with a noose around his neck. This hushed silence was due to the natural human response to a sacrifice. Patterson eloquently calls this an "awed hush, in the face and smell of death." He also claims that "an essential part of the sacrificial rite is that some profound change occurs in the sacrificed object, and there is awe in actually witnessing the transition from a state of life to a state of death." There are many documented instances of lynchings that afterwards, resulted in a sudden silence from its witnesses.
Conclusion
I believe that the Marion lynchings emulated the nationwide and ritualistic practice which occurred due to social and racial issues. The reasoning for both national lynchings and Marion’s lynchings were similar in nature and based off of male white supremacist beliefs. The people of Marion were well-informed of the lynching process due to the influence of their local newspaper and their actions were a result of deeply-ingrained human sacrificial nature. This research concludes that the Marion lynching was not an isolated incident, but part of a national movement of violence and racism towards African Americans.
References
Cameron, James. A Time of Terror. Self-published, 1982; reprinted Black Classics Press, 1994. Print.
Madison, James. A Lynching in the Heartland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001. Print.
"Deserved His Fate." Marion Daily Chronicle 1891, Print.
Patterson, Orlando. Rituals of Blood. Washington D.C.: Civitas Counterpoint, 1998. Print.
Credits
This paper was written by Meredith Kuczora for Mr. Munn's IU ACP history class at Marion High School during May 2011.
